Skip to main content

Alexander the Great Defeated in India - Part I

Alexander III of Macedon (20 July 356 BC – 10 June 323 BC), commonly known as Alexander the Great (Greek: Ἀλέξανδρος ὁ Μέγας, Aléxandros ho Mégas Koine Greek, was a king (basileus) of the Ancient Greek kingdom of Macedon. He launched unprecedented military campaign through Asia and northeast Africa, and created one of the largest empires of the ancient world by the age of thirty, stretching from Greece to Northwestern India. It is claimed that he was undefeated in battles and is widely considered one of history's most successful military commanders. I intend to challenge that notion with this blog and make a case that Alexander was defeated in Punjab in 326 BC and escaped India badly bruised and in disarray.
Alexander the Macedonian

Conquest of Persia

Persia was a powerful empire that had attacked Greece multiple times. Alexander broke the power of Persia in the decisive battles of Issus and Gaugamela. He subsequently overthrew Persian King Darius III and conquered the Achaemenid Empire in its entirety.
Alexander conquers Persia
After burning down the ancient city of Persepolis, Alexander sought to reach the "End of the world and the Great Outer Sea" and invaded India in 326 BC. Greek historians claim that he won an important victory over the Pauravas at the Battle of the Hydaspes. Greek historian say that he turned back at the demand of his homesick troops. Alexander died in Babylon in 323 BC, the city that he planned to establish as his capital.

Is ths entirely true?

Arrival at NW Frontiers

The campaign took Alexander through Media (NW Persia), Parthia, Aria (West Afghanistan), Drangiana (SW Afghanistan) , Arachosia (South and Central Afghanistan), Bactria (North and Central Afghanistan), and Scythia (Central Asia).

Alexander first conquered Bactria and then invited the chieftains of the former Satrap of Gandhara (Eastern Afghanistan and Northern Pakistan), to submit to his authority. Omphis (Indian name Ambhi), the ruler of Taxila, whose kingdom extended up to the Indus, complied, but the chieftains of some hill clans, including the Aspasioi and Assakenoi refused to submit.
Gandhara Kingdom
King of Gandhara, Ambhi (Called Taxiles by the Greeks based on his capitol Taxila) heard about Alexander's plunder of Persia and hastened to prevent the wrath of Alexander. He met Alexander with valuable presents, placing himself and all his forces at his disposal. In return Alexander presented him with "Persian robes, gold and silver ornaments, 30 horses and 1000 talents in gold".
Gandhara King Ambhi in Alexander;s Court
After dealing with the Aspasioi and Assakenoi, Alexander crossed the Indus where he was confronted b a ruler known to the Greeks as Πῶρος Pôros (Latin: Porus), whose name suggested that he was a member of the Paurava dynasty (whose founder was supposedly named Puru).  Arrian writes about Porus, in his own words "One of the Indian Kings called Porus a man remarkable alike for his personal strength and noble courage, on hearing the report about Alexander, began to prepare for the inevitable. Accordingly, when hostilities broke out, he ordered his army to attack Macedonians from whom he demanded their king, as if he was his private enemy. Alexander lost no time in joining battle, but his horse being wounded in the first charge, he fell headlong to the ground, and was saved by his attendants who hastened up to his assistance".
King Porus - Paurava
The dscendents of Porus are the "Puri" Khatris of the Mid-Punjab region. Most are Sikhs or Hindus and migrated to India after the creation of Pakistan.

Crossing Hydaspes River

The Battle of the Hydaspes was fought by Alexander in July 326 BC against Porus (Paurava), a Kshatriya king of Mid Punajb region located on the Hydaspes River (Jhelum). The battle of Hydaspes river was not only Alexander's last battle; it was also the most costly battle that his armies fought.

Porus believed and hoped Alexander would have to either wait for the monsoon season to end before crossing or simply abandon his quest and leave. Despite heavy monsoon rains, Porus drew up on the south bank of the Jhelum River, and was set to repel any crossings.
River Jhelum - Hydaspes
The Jhelum River was deep and fast enough that any opposed crossing would probably doom the entire attacking force. Alexander knew that a direct crossing would fail and Porus is prepared to pounce. During a stormy night, Alexander and his smaller army slipped away from the Jhelum through a hidden valley, out of sight of Porus. At dawn, Alexander crossed the Jhelum, about 27 km (17 miles) upstream from his initial camp. The name of the place is 'Kadee'.
Battle positions at Zhelum River

Ambush of Patrol Party

Porus could not believe the news that the Macedonians had reached the east bank. He sent his son Malayketu to find out what had happened. Alexander ambushed the patrol party sent by Porus. In the fierce encounter, Malayketu killed Alexanders's horse with one blow and Alexander fell to the ground. Arrian also writing about the same encounter adds that "Other writers state that there was a fight at the actual landing between Alexander's cavalry and a force of Indians commanded by Porus's son, who was there ready to oppose them with superior numbers, and that in the course of fighting he (Porus's son) wounded Alexander with his own hand and struck the blow which killed his (Alexander's) beloved horse Buccaphalus."
Buccaphalus killed by Son of Porus
The Greeks prevailed due to a large force and Porus' son was killed along with his smaller patrol.

Battle of Hydaspes

Porus now saw that Alexander's crossing force was larger than he had expected, and decided to face it with the bulk of his army. Arrian records that in the final encounter with Alexander, Porus employed all his cavalry, 4,000 strong, all his chariots, 300 in number, 200 of his elephants, and 30,000 of efficient infantry along with 2,000 men and 120 chariots detached earlier in the day under his son's charge. Porus, atop his elephant, led his elephant corps instead of the usual double-horse chariot used by Indian kings.

The fighting style of Porus' soldiers was described in detail by Arrian: "The foot soldiers carry a bow made of equal length with the man who bears it. This they rest upon the ground, and pressing against it with their left foot thus discharges the arrow, having drawn the string far backwards for the shaft they use is little short for three yards long, and there is nothing can resist an Indian archer's shot, neither shield nor breast plate, nor any stronger defense if such there be.

The Macedonians had never encountered elephants. They were terrorized by the sheer size of the war elephants and their ferocity.
Greek Cavalry meets War Elephants of Porus
Diodorus wrote about the battle tactics of war elephants - "Upon this the elephants, applying to good use their prodigious size and strength, killed some of the enemy by trampling under their feet, and crushing their armour and their bones, while upon other they inflicted a terrible death, for they first lifted them aloft with their trunks, which they and twisted round their bodies and then dashed them down with great violence to the ground. Many others they deprived in a moment of life by goring then through and through with their tusks"
Battle of Hydaspes
Porus's army were poised with cavalry on both flanks, the war elephants in front, and infantry behind the elephants. These war elephants presented an especially difficult situation for Alexander, as they scared the Macedonian horses. The elephants caused heavy losses to the Macedonians, with their tusks fitted with iron spikes and lifting some before trampling them. Alexander sent his phalanx to attack the elephants, which were forced back on their own side. They tried to box the Indian infantry and cavalry, many of whom were trampled to death.

Alexander started the battle by sending horse archers to shower the Porus's left cavalry wing, and then used his cavalry to attack Puru's cavalry. Meanwhile, the Macedonian phalanxes had crossed the river to engage the charge of the war elephants.

Alexander commanded the Companion cavalry and the mounted archers of the Dahae, which were on his right wing. Seeing that his left wing chariots were outnumbered by the Macedonian cavalry, Porus moved his right wing chariots to the left; at that moment, Coenus moved to the now undefended Indian right wing and encircled the enemy lines, attacking them in the rear. Meanwhile, Craterus crossed the river and joined the other Macedonians.
Tactical Map of the Battle of Hydaspes

Did Alexander Concede to Porus?

The heavy rains made the it difficult for the elephants to charge on wet slippery ground. Indian archers found it difficult to leverage their larger bows on the ground to aim at the advancing Macedonians. From now on, the Indians were on all sides surrounded, and the battlefield changed into a killing ground. Porus refused to accept defeat and fought till the end. According to Justin, during the battle, Porus challenged Alexander, who charged him on horseback. Alexander fell off his horse in the ensuing duel, his bodyguards carrying him off.
Porus challenges Alexander
Alexander was staring at a potential defeat. According to Curtius Quintus, Alexander towards the end of the day sent a few ambassadors to Porus: "Alexander, anxious to save the life of this great and gallant soldier, sent Texile the Indian to him (to Porus). Texile rode up as near as he dared and requested him to stop his elephant and hear what message Alexander sent him, escape was no longer possible. But Texiles was an old enemy of the Indian King, and Porus turned his elephant and drove at him, to kill him with his lance; and he might indeed have killed him, if he had not spurred his horse out of the way in the nick of the time. Alexander, however, far from resenting this treatment of his messenger, sent a number of others, last of whom was Indian named Meroes, a man he had been told had long been Porus' friend".(Arrian Page 180)

Admiration of Porus by Greek Historians

Greek historians agree that Porus bravely fought until the end unlike Darius who fled after being defeated during the Battle of Gaugamela. Two sons of Porus were killed during the battle, as well as his relative and ally Spitakes, and most of his chieftains.

Throughout the battle King Porus remained on his elephant, despite suffering severe wounds, refusing to admit defeat and surrender. Alexander approached the proud, defeated king and asked him how he wanted to be treated. Wounded in his shoulder, standing over 2 m (6 ft 7 in) tall, but still on his feet, he was asked by Alexander how he wished to be treated. "Treat me, Alexander, the way a King treats another King" Porus responded. Alexander respected this and told Porus he would remain king, owing allegiance to Alexander.
Alexander meets Porus after Battle
Alexander did not continue, thus leaving most of Pentopotamia (Punjab) unconquered. Afterwards, Alexander founded Alexandria Nikaia (Victory), located at the battle site, to commemorate his triumph. He also founded Alexandria Bucephalus on the opposite bank of the river in memory of his much-cherished horse, Bucephalus, who carried Alexander through the Indian subcontinent, and died heroically during the Battle of Hydaspes.

Did Porus Defeat Alexander?

Rogers (1970), questions the accuracy of this entire event, writing that Porus would never have said those words. According to Plutarch this was one of Alexander's hardest battle " The combat then was of a more mixed kind; but maintained with such obstinacy, that it was not decided till the eight hour of the day." Plutarch also wrote that the bitter fighting of the Hydaspes made Alexander's men hesitant to continue on with the conquest of India, considering that they would potentially face far larger armies than those of Porus if they were to cross the Ganges River.

I have a few questions for the Western historians doubting the historical accuracy of Greek version:
  • Was Alexander captured by Porus after he fell from his horse?
  • Why would Alexander send Taxiles and later Meroes to Porus to broker peace if he won the battle of Hydaspes?
  • Did the battle end in a stalemate with Meroes brokering treaty between Porus and Alexander?
  • Why did Alexander retreat from Punjab? 
  • Did Greek soldiers refused to fight in India because they were homesick or they were traumatized by the battle of Hydaspes?
  • Is it possible that the event of the battle were spun by the Greek historian to portray graceful retreat of Alexander from Punjab but infact it was a demoralizing defeat?
More on Alexander's ungraceful retreat from Pentopotamia in Part II ...

References

  1. http://www.tribuneindia.com/2009/20090329/spectrum/main5.htm
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_campaign_of_Alexander_the_Great
  4. http://burnpit.us/2012/05/battle-hydaspes-river-alexander-great-defeats-indian-king-porus
  5. http://wunderkammertales.blogspot.com/2016/05/victorious-hellenes-should-dance-again.html
  6. https://in.rbth.com/blogs/2013/05/27/marshal_zhukov_on_alexanders_failed_india_invasion_25383
  7. http://savitri.in/blogs/light-of-supreme/alexanders-invasion-ambhi-was-not-a-traitor-by-arun-nigudkar
  8. http://history.stackexchange.com/questions/10104/why-didnt-alexander-invade-india
  9. https://pparihar.com/2015/08/16/true-story-of-alexander-west-hiding/
  10. https://controversialhistory.blogspot.com/2007/04/myth-of-alexander-victory-in-india.html
  11. http://www.menumagazine.co.uk/book/dawnofhistorymore.html
  12. http://murugan.org/research/gopalapillai.htm
  13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxiles
  14. http://www.ancient.eu/Gandhara_Civilization/
  15. http://www.menumagazine.co.uk/book/dawnofhistorymore.html

Comments

  1. Nice work Sir-

    this is indeed good piece of work and great level of effort.

    Please do connect - I am located in Washington DC- Metro Area.

    Thank You.
    and once again,
    Great Work...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Really superb and thanks for sharing knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Raja Paurava, Apollonius records, had copper-plate murals put up in two temples in Taxila. Both plates depicted scenes from his encounter with Alexander. Both showed him the vanquished and Alexander the victor. Both were installed as an acknowledgement of the Punjabi raja’s friendship with Alexander some time after word arrived from Babylon that the great conqueror had died.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comments. However, we need to understand that Taxila was not in Paurava's territory. It was located in the kingdom of his arch rival Ambhi, the King of Gandhara, (Called Taxiles by the Greeks based on his capitol Taxila) who sided with Alexander in the battle of Hydaspes. Please read my follow up blog on the reason why I am certain that Alexander lost the battle of Hydaspes. The hypothesis is based on historical chronicles and not just author's assumptions. Here is the link: https://malicethoughts.blogspot.com/2017/04/alexander-great-disgraceful-retreat.html

      Delete
  4. A really interesting take on the event of the battle between Porus and Alexander. For decades, it has been accepted that King Porus was the defeated one, courtesy of Greek historians. But the sporadic documentations along with the questions that you have raised really makes it crucial to revisit the events that have truly ensued in this battle between the giants

    ReplyDelete
  5. we all know that the reason South Indians were never conquered is because of their strong army. if Alexander was to come to south India (tamilnadu), he would have lost quite badly to the cholas. however he was wise and knew he would suffer defeat and stayed away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your comments are a total figment and historically false.South Indians were captured by North Indians and converted to Vedic religion. They were conquered by Afghans who established the kingdoms of Hyderabad, Golconda, and Mysore. Its a fact that Tipu Sultan the "Tiger of Mysore" destroyed Hindu temples, massacred South Indians, and converted thousands of them into Islam. His rule extended as far as Malabar coast. Its also true that the south india was the first to surrender to the Europeans - the Portuguese first and then to the British. This started the annexation of India with Punjab being the last to fall.
      Please read history before making historically false comments.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lost Cities of Punjab - Ancestral Home of Punjabi Communities

Punjabi Ignorance We, the Punjabis historically have not been documenting our own history. The Muslim Punjabis have almost forgotten their genetic ancestry and now try to connect their gene pool to the Arab aristocracy of Sayeds and Qureshis. The Pakistan government ignorantly names its missiles after the Islamic invaders who dispossessed their ancestors from their land. The Hindu Punjabis have written off their own ancestors, warriors kings, and Gurus and relate more to the Middle-India heroes such as Rama, Krishna, and Shivaji, The Sikhs have done a better job in staying connected to their roots but their historical reach is limited just to the Sikh period. Punjab history has to be taken as a whole, and that includes, Adivasis, Indus valley, Aryan Khatris, Kushans, Rajputs, Gujjars, Jatts, Islamic invaders, Sikh period, British rule, and the post independence era. Trinity of Punjabi Pride What's the Problem? So what? The results of this ignorance is astounding. We never ...

The Real Story of Heer Ranjha

We all are familiar with Waris Shah (Urdu: السيد وارث علي شاه النقوي الرضوي البهكري البدراني‎) , ਵਾਰਿਸ ਸ਼ਾਹ (Gurmukhi); 1722–1798) who was a Punjabi Sufi poet of Chishti order, renowned for his contribution to Punjabi literature by immortalizing the love story of Heer Ranjha .  His poetic verse is a treasure-trove of Punjabi phrases, idioms and sayings. His minute and realistic depiction of the details of Punjabi life and political situation in the 18th century, remains unique and the entire poem is an album of colorful and enchanting pictures of life in the Punjab, deeply absorbing. Abdur Rehman Chugtai painting of Heer and Ranjha Waris Shah was deeply learned in Sufi and domestic cultural lore. His depiction of story of romantic love is a poetic expression of the mystical love of the human soul towards God – the quintessential subject in Sufism and a recurring theme in both Sufi and Sikh mysticism. The Legend Heer is an extremely beautiful woman, born into a wealthy fam...

Origin of Chhabras

Chhabra (pronounced Chhabrha) Punjabi - ਛਾਬੜਾ, Hindi - छाबड़ा Gujarati - છાબડા Chhabras are a common demographic group found primarily in Punjab region. The Chhabras are considered a subset (Gotra: Sankrit, Got: Punjabi) of Punjabi Arora community. In fact Chhabras originating from Chhab, West Punjab are a distinct but related to the Aroras originating from Aror , Sindh. The ancestors of Chhabras were mainly concentrated in West Punjab (now Pakistan) along the banks of the Indus River and its tributaries; in the Majha region in East Punjab (India), and the North-West Frontier Province; and in Sindh (mainly as Sindhi Aroras) In post-independence and post-partition India, Aroras and Chhabra mainly reside in Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi, Jammu, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Gujarat. Map of Indus Valley Civilization Sites Demography Almost all Chhabras are either Sikhs or Hindus. There are some Muslim Chhabras who live in West Punjab, Pakistan or in We...